More Fort Chastity Device Adjustments
I may have found a solution to the pull-out issue, as well as the weight of the device!
Boy Toy had mentioned it would need a kind of belt. He also told me that when he went for a walk while wearing the thing, the other day, he tied a string around his waist, passing it underneath the pins holding the two parts of the device together. This got me thinking. I didn’t want a string or leather belt, metal seems more secure to me. And it so happens that we have plenty of chains here. Then it struck me: why not try passing the pins that are attached to the tube through links in the chain?
I took out a fairly small and smooth piece of chain (I want him to be comfortable, after all!) and found larger, circular rings which I opened with pliers, passed through the last links in the chain and closed back up. I called Boy Toy over for a fitting and the result is pretty awesome!
Not only does it hold the chastity cage up, it also prevents him from being able to pull his cock out of the tube. Sure, he could easily cut the chain with pliers, but then he’d have to explain the broken chain to me… I feel much more confident that he is securely locked away, with the chain. And he was leaking profusely all over the place so obviously the psychological effect is back.
It did help with the comfort factor while wearing pants, as well. Boy Toy has always told me that he feels more comfortable not wearing pants, when in a chastity cage, because the pants push the device into him. With the Fort combined with the chain, though, it seems as if there is much less discomfort. He was quite amazed when he sat down and nothing “caught”.
The only drawback is that since the chain holds the device up, when Boy Toy put pants on, he had a quite noticeable bulge. Kinda looks like he has a hard-on, or a very fucking big cock. So yeah, I guess there might still be some more adjustments.
There’s another noteworthy thing which happened with the device lately. I mentioned we switched to the smallest ring and that it fit very nicely. However, one night, Boy Toy woke me up at 4 am telling me he was in pain. Apparently, this ring is just too tight for his nightly erections. We’ve now switched back to a slightly larger ring. With the chain around his waist, I think we’ve got the right fit.
Category: Chastity, Review, Toys | 
7 Comments »
November 21st, 2009 at 3:17 pm
Very creative solution.
November 21st, 2009 at 3:58 pm
It looks really fucking hot with that chain. JMO.
I’ll be curious to see how comfortable it is to wear.
November 21st, 2009 at 3:59 pm
He says it’s very comfortable.
November 21st, 2009 at 10:51 pm
Hmmm
McGyver would be proud!
Excellent solution.
November 22nd, 2009 at 9:15 pm
Sage: Thanks! But I think McGyver would have managed it with a sock and a Bobby pin.
November 26th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
<>
My Fort arrived yesterday so just to round off my earlier comments.
Real cost after adding customs clearance, duty, shipping is more like £223 (GBP). In the UK a CB6000 is around £95.
It is definitely impressive, much more solid than my Gerecke steel device. In real terms security is similar since the weak point for both is the lock but psychologically it feels a lot more secure, a combination of appearance, weight and tighter more enclosing fit.
Looks like hygiene will be easier than the CB6000 in terms of both cleaning and urinating.
The KSD-G3 does not fit as I would like. There is a slight lip to the entrance to the tube and the tube is a little lower down from the locking post hole than in a CB6000. It is workable but will be better when I have had a go at the K3 to alter its upper part to fit better.
Somehow I’m going to need to find a way to get a custom locking pin made once I have decided on long term setup. The current one sticks out too far. Given they provide five rings it seems miserly to have just one length of post.
My 15mm Asus padlock sits fairly flat and surprisingly the bulge under clothing is certainly no worse than a Cb6000, possibly slightly less.
Security with the K3 is good. I suspect I could pull out but that to do so would leave me cut and bruised, I tried and decided not to take the experiment to self mutilating extremes.
Weight is … interesting. Here are some figures, all with smallest K3 and lock:-
CB6000S – 73g
CB6000 – 83g
Gerecke – 199g
Fort – 352g (or using 2 smallest rings 473g)
Not only won’t this go through airport security I’d suggest not even walking past the building
Despite the weight after a few hours it is surprisingly unnoticeable.
I’ll be making an add on to enable use of my frenum piercing ring for security after which I’ll do some longer term wear trials but certainly it is comfortable and I’m very happy with it.
Given it is adjustable, and with the K3 secure, this is perhaps the best device yet for the fantasy of springing non consensual chastity on someone without warning. Using a modified long hasp padlock (jammed shut with superglue) in place of the locking pin it should be proof against all but an angle grinder or several hours with a HSS handsaw.
Michael.
November 28th, 2009 at 7:10 pm
Michael X: Yes, it is a little pricey. I felt kinda guilty spending so much on a sex toy, and I’ve used this against Boy Toy, too! I kept telling him that since I paid so much for it, he’d have to wear it a lot
As far as weight and security, we’ve found that the chain around the waist resolves both. The psychological effects are certainly there. And I LOVE the looks of it!
Boy Toy told me, just the other day, that he finds it incredibly comfortable to wear. Even more so than the CB. With the chain, it is especially true. He says the ring circling the cock and balls is much better on the Fort. No squared angles on this device, all rounded and smooth.
All in all, I think it was worth its price.
Oh and about the custom locking pin, I’d check with Tom Allen at The Edge of Vanilla, if I were you. He makes them, and if I’m not mistaken, intends on selling them soon.